Loading
No response came from Camm. Neither minister gave Brisbane Times a response, either. But that changed this week after this masthead asked Camm’s office about her lack of reply to Jigsaw.
What they said
In her Thursday letter, which came after questions from this masthead on Wednesday, Camm noted she has raised the concerns with Frecklington and suggested further questions go to her department.
In a later statement to Brisbane Times, Camm said she would continue working with Frecklington to address the issues “arising from the change made by the Registry of Births, Deaths and Marriages”.
“I have responded to Jigsaw Queensland’s correspondence,” she said. “A meeting with Jigsaw Queensland will be organised in due course.”
Another perspective
Sparrow said Camm and Frecklington were “deflecting responsibility … with neither stepping forward to resolve or reverse what is essentially an executive decision by RBDM and [the department]”.
“Meanwhile, people affected by adoption – many of whom have waited decades for answers – remain in distress and uncertainty,” she said.
“Many are up against the clock with time running out as their parents are ageing.
“Instead of leadership, we are seeing reactive, piecemeal responses – scrambling quietly in the background because the media has started asking questions”.
In September, a departmental spokesperson would not be drawn on any specific catalyst for the change and whether other options were considered.
Labor’s shadow attorney-general Meaghan Scanlon accused Camm of “burying her head in the sand and ignoring the people she’s supposed to support”.
Start the day with a summary of the day’s most important and interesting stories, analysis and insights. Sign up for our Morning Edition newsletter.
