Miley Cyrus Seeks Dismissal of “Flowers” Lawsuit –

25-Feb-2026: Miley Cyrus is taking legal action in response to a copyright lawsuit targeting her chart-topping hit, “Flowers.” The singer has officially filed a motion seeking dismissal of the case, arguing that the claims lack sufficient legal merit.

The move marks the latest development in the ongoing dispute surrounding one of the biggest songs of the decade.

What Is the Lawsuit About?

The lawsuit alleges that “Flowers” bears similarities to a previously released track, with plaintiffs claiming elements of melody, harmony, or lyrical phrasing overlap in a way that constitutes copyright infringement.

Cyrus’ legal team, however, contends that the song is an original work and that any perceived similarities fall within common musical structures frequently used across pop music.

In the motion to dismiss, her attorneys reportedly argue that the complaint fails to demonstrate substantial similarity under copyright law — a key threshold in music infringement cases.

Why “Flowers” Became a Cultural Moment

Released in early 2023, “Flowers” quickly became a global anthem of independence and self-love. The track dominated streaming charts, topped the Billboard Hot 100, and sparked viral social media trends.

The song’s empowering message and catchy production helped solidify Cyrus’ continued evolution as an artist, following previous reinventions throughout her career.

Because of its massive commercial success, any legal challenge involving the song naturally draws intense public attention.

The Legal Strategy

Filing a motion to dismiss is often an early-stage defense strategy. It asks the court to throw out the case before it proceeds to lengthy discovery or trial proceedings.

Cyrus’ legal team argues that:

• The alleged similarities are too generic to qualify as infringement
• Musical building blocks like chord progressions are not protected
• The complaint does not meet the legal standard for substantial similarity

If the court agrees, the case could be dismissed without moving forward to trial.

If denied, the case would likely proceed to further legal analysis, including expert testimony comparing both works in detail.

Copyright Battles in the Music Industry

Music copyright disputes have become increasingly common in recent years. As streaming platforms make songs instantly accessible worldwide, similarities — intentional or not — are more easily scrutinized.

High-profile cases involving major artists have reshaped how courts interpret melody, rhythm, and production similarities.

However, courts typically distinguish between protectable creative expression and standard musical elements that appear across genres.

Miley Cyrus’ Response

Cyrus has not made extensive public comments about the lawsuit, choosing instead to let her legal team handle the matter in court.

Professionally, she continues focusing on music and creative projects, appearing unshaken by the legal headlines.

Fans have shown strong support online, praising “Flowers” as a defining pop anthem of the 2020s.

What Happens Next?

The court will review the motion to dismiss and determine whether the lawsuit has enough legal basis to proceed.

Possible outcomes include:

1. Case Dismissed – The court sides with Cyrus and ends the lawsuit early.
2. Amended Complaint – Plaintiffs may be allowed to revise and refile their claims.
3. Proceed to Trial – If the motion is denied, the case could move into discovery and potentially trial.

For now, the legal battle remains in its early stages.

FAQs

1. Why is Miley Cyrus being sued over “Flowers”?

The lawsuit claims the song contains similarities to another previously released track, alleging copyright infringement.

2. What does it mean to file a motion to dismiss?

It’s a legal request asking the court to throw out the case before it proceeds further.

3. Has Miley Cyrus commented publicly?

She has not made detailed public statements, relying on her legal team to address the matter.

4. Could the case go to trial?

Yes, if the motion to dismiss is denied, the case could move forward to discovery and potentially trial.

5. When was the dismissal filed?

The motion seeking dismissal was filed in February 2026.