Skip to content
-
Subscribe to our newsletter & never miss our best posts. Subscribe Now!
  • https://www.facebook.com/
  • https://twitter.com/
  • https://t.me/
  • https://www.instagram.com/
  • https://youtube.com/
Blendy News
Blendy News
  • Home
  • About us
  • Cart
  • Checkout
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer
  • My account
  • Privacy Policy
  • Shop
  • Home
  • About us
  • Cart
  • Checkout
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer
  • My account
  • Privacy Policy
  • Shop
Subscribe
Close

Search

Judge Cannon blocks Jack Smith report release
Business NewsEntrepreneurshipInvestmentsStartupsStock MarketUncategorized

Judge Cannon blocks Jack Smith report release

By Abrar Hussain
February 23, 2026 3 Min Read
0

Aileen M. Cannon, United States District Judge, Southern District of Florida

Courtesy: US Courts

A Florida federal judge appointed by President Donald Trump blocked the public release of a final report by former special counsel Jack Smith on his prosecution of Trump for retaining classified documents after leaving the White House at his Mar-a-Lago club and for blocking efforts to retrieve them.

Judge Aileen Cannon in her Monday ruling cited her July 2024 ruling that Smith was not legally appointed as special counsel, which led to her dismissing the criminal case against Trump, as the key reason she said that Volume II of his final report on the case should not be made public.

Smith had obtained a grand jury indictment of Trump on charges related to those documents in June 2023, more than two years after Trump ended his first term in the White House.

Cannon in Monday’s order blasted Smith for his “brazen stratagem” of compiling evidence and other material obtained during his investigation and “compiling it into a final report” to the attorney general after she ruled his appointment as special counsel violated the appointments clause of the U.S. Constitution.

Smith had taken those actions while appealing the judge’s dismissal of the criminal case against Trump. That appeal was dropped by the Department of Justice after Trump won the 2024 presidential election.

Read more CNBC politics coverage

Cannon, in her ruling Monday, said releasing Smith’s report “would cause irreparable damage to former defendants from disclosure of non-public” material that was exchanged between Smith’s prosecution team and defense lawyers, which involved “still-contested grand jury and privilege concerns.”

“And it would contravene basic notions of fairness and justice in the process, where no adjudication of guilt has been reached following initiation of criminal charges,” Cannon wrote in her order in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

“There is the matter of manifest injustice to the former defendants that would result from disclosure of Volume II,” she wrote.

“Special Counsel Smith, acting without lawful authority, obtained an indictment in this action and initiated proceedings that resulted in a final order of dismissal of all charges. As a result, the former defendants in this case, like any other defendant in this situation, still enjoy the presumption of innocence held sacrosanct in our constitutional order.”

Former U.S. Special Counsel Jack Smith arrives for a closed-door deposition as part of a House Judiciary Committee inquiry into his now-dismissed cases against U.S. President Donald Trump over his efforts to overturn the 2020 election results and his retention of classified documents, on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., U.S., December 17, 2025.

Kevin Mohatt | Reuters

Trump’s co-defendants in the case, his valet Walt Nauta and Mar-a-Lago worker Carlos de Oliveira, originally asked Cannon to block the release of Smith’s report. Trump in January asked Cannon to bar it from being made public.

In a curious footnote in her order on Monday, Cannon referenced the fact that her ruling blocking the release of Smith reports could be appealed and that her decision could be overturned by either the 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals or the Supreme Court.

“As always, this Court will follow whatever mandates come from a higher court in resolving any future requests for judicial relief in this or any other case,” Cannon wrote.

Federal district court judges, as a rule, follow mandates from higher federal courts and do not typically take the time to affirm that practice in a written order.

Also on Monday, Cannon denied a motion by two groups, the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University and American Oversight, to stay her ruling on releasing Smith’s report pending the outcome of their appeals of her prior ruling blocking them from pursuing arguments that the report should be made public.

Author

Abrar Hussain

Follow Me
Other Articles
Con immunoterapia aumento sopravvivenza globale
Previous

Con immunoterapia aumento sopravvivenza globale

Autopsia de ‘El Mencho’ ForoGore: ¿Se filtra video muerto y fotos del cuerpo en Telegram?
Next

Autopsia de ‘El Mencho’ ForoGore: ¿Se filtra video muerto y fotos del cuerpo en Telegram?

No Comment! Be the first one.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright 2026 — Blendy News. All rights reserved. Blogsy WordPress Theme