On Thursday, the UN’s top humanitarian official, Tom Fletcher, briefed ambassadors at the Security Council about the “darker hell” to which El Fasher has descended.
“Women and girls are being raped, people being mutilated and killed – with utter impunity,” he said, detailing reports that have penetrated the telecommunications blackout gripping the war-torn country. “We cannot hear the screams, but – as we sit here today – the horror is continuing.”
Donald Trump leaves Washington DC on Friday to spend the weekend in Florida.Credit: AP
In the shadow of Sudan’s misery, United States President Donald Trump has done conspicuously little. He insists he’s the world’s greatest peacemaker – claiming credit for resolving conflicts that, in some instances, are either still raging or never existed in the first place. But ending the world’s greatest humanitarian disaster has not been a priority for his administration.
The White House was more focused on gutting USAID, an agency that propped up critical elements of the humanitarian complex aiding Sudanese people. It also wants to fast-track deportations of unwanted migrants to neighbouring South Sudan, which itself is in the grip of a brewing civil war.
There’s no simple solution to ending the war in Sudan. The two rival forces – the Sudanese military under the country’s army chief General Abdel-Fattah Burhan, and Hemedti’s RSF – are entrenched in their fiefdoms and backed by a tangle of foreign powers.
Loading
The former counts on aid from countries like Egypt and Iran, while the RSF, which lost its foothold in the capital Khartoum in March, was reinforced by shipments of weapons from the United Arab Emirates. Turkey, Russia and even Ukraine have played roles in supplying the warring parties. Saudi Arabia and Qatar, too, have extensive interests in the region.
According to documents seen at the UN Security Council, RSF fighters touted British-manufactured small arms, among other materiel, that were likely first exported to the UAE.
A recent report in the Wall Street Journal cited the assessment of US intelligence agencies that the UAE also sent sophisticated weapons like Chinese drones to boost the sagging fortunes of the RSF, which seemed on the precipice of losing the war after its retreat from Khartoum. Now, it’s on firmer ground. It remains in control of much of Sudan’s gold mines, the ore of which often makes its way to markets in Dubai.
The UAE denies any role in supporting the RSF’s military campaign.
An injured man who fled El Fasher seeks shelter at the refugee camp in Tawila on Friday.Credit: AP
“The war would be over if not for the UAE,” a former chief of staff to successive US presidential special envoys for Sudan, Cameron Hudson, told the Journal. “The only thing that is keeping [the RSF] in this war is the overwhelming amount of military support that they’re receiving from the UAE.”
A host of analysts believe Trump could do more to lean on the UAE, a monarchy to which he has many close connections.
After relative silence, lawmakers in Congress are also starting to speak up. Senator James Risch, a Republican from Idaho and the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, called on the US to officially designate the RSF as a foreign terrorist organisation.
“The horrors in Darfur’s El Fasher were no accident – they were the RSF’s plan all along,” he said in a statement on Tuesday. “The RSF has waged terror and committed unspeakable atrocities, genocide among them, against the Sudanese people.”
RSF fighters celebrate in the streets of El Fasher on Sunday, in an image taken from the RSF Telegram account.Credit: AFP
Senator Jeanne Shaheen, from New Hampshire, Risch’s Democratic counterpart on the committee, pointed the finger at the US’s Gulf ally. “The UAE has been an irresponsible player who has contributed to one of the worst humanitarian crises that we have on the planet right now,” she told reporters on Wednesday.
There’s little hope for any Trumpian art of the deal in Sudan. “The US is not a hegemon here, but a secondary player in a crowded field of ambitious middle powers,” Sudanese analyst Elfadil Ibrahim noted, arguing that ending the war would require “sustained engagement and … a willingness to exert real pressure on external patrons, as well as a long-term commitment to supporting a genuinely inclusive political process.”
For a White House that loves its quick deals and photo opportunities, such an effort is unlikely. And so a sprawling tragedy that has claimed more than 150,000 lives and displaced millions keeps unfurling.
Loading
“The Sudan crisis is, at its core, a failure of protection, and our responsibility to uphold international law,” Fletcher, the UN official, said on Thursday. “Atrocities are committed with unashamed expectation of impunity … the world has failed an entire generation.”
The Washington Post
Get a note directly from our foreign correspondents on what’s making headlines around the world. Sign up for our weekly What in the World newsletter.
